Tuesday, September 28, 2010

Chernobyl Incident




 
 The Chernobyl accident was occurred in 1986. Two Chernobyl plant workers died immediately and a further 28 people died within a few weeks due to acute radiation poisoning. The peoples around the case area were relocated. The April 1986 disaster at the Chernobyl nuclear power plant in the Ukraine was the product of  a not good design reactor and the also mistake made by  reactor operator in terms of safety culture. The accident destroyed the Chernobyl 4 reactor, killing 30 operators within three months and several further deaths later. Two people were killed immediately at the site. The Chernobyl disaster was the only accident in the history of commercial nuclear power where radiation-related fatalities occurred .However, the design of the reactor is unique and the accident is thus of little relevance to the rest of the nuclear industry outside the then Eastern Bloc.



The Chernobyl incident had experienced positive (+ve) reactivity feedback effect. We need to know first what the reactivity is. Reactivity is a measure of the departure of a reactor from criticality. Actually the criticality is related to the effective multiplication factor, keff. Multiplication factor keff is the ratio of number of fission in one generation to the number of fission in preceeding generation as shown below.


In diffusion theory when k < 1, the condition of reactor is subcritical. Subcritical mean the neutron population is keep decreasing in each generation. If we have k =1, the condition of reactor is called critical. Critical means the neutron population in the reactor is neither decreasing nor increasing. It is also called self-sustaining for the neutron chain reaction. When we have k > 1, the population neutron is supercritical. We know that the neutron population is increasing to each generation. The k value is important to determine the criticality. Actually the reactivity, ρ is related with keff with the equation below:
 



Once we know the amount of reactivity, ρ in reactor core, the population of neutron can be determined. Hence we can predict the reactor power at any given time. We should noted that there are many factor that effect the power level in reactor such as fuel depletion, temperature of reactor, pressure of reactor and poisons. Because there are many parameters to consider, the reactivity coefficient (αx) is introduced. Actually, the reactivity coefficient (αx) is the amount of change in reactivity per unit change in parameter and is given by





Where Δρ = reactivity defects and Δx = change in variable parameter that effects reactivity. We can further observe the relationship of each variable in above equation. The Table 1 below shows the relationship of each variable





Δx
Δρ
αx
↑
+ve
+ve
↑
-ve
-ve


Table 1 : Relationship between each variable


 Changes in the physical properties materials in reactor will results in change of reactivity. Hence the reactivity coefficient (αx) is very crucial in indentifying the reactivity change (Δρ) given the change in physical properties (Δx). In nuclear physics, there are four most important reacticity coefficient αx listed below 

1)      Moderator temperature coefficient of ρ, αTmod                       (moderator/coolant) 
2)      Fuel temperature coefficient of ρ, αTfuel                                     (fuel) 
3)      Pressure coefficient of ρ, αP                                                             (moderator/coolant) 
4)      Void coefficient of ρ, αvoid                                                               (moderator/coolant)











Figure 1 : Variation of keff and its factors with the fuel-to-moderator ratio

Graph in Figure 1 is applicable to a large core fuelled with low-enriched fuel which is been used in nuclear industry today. We have been introduced with another ratio which is Nm/Nu ratio and also called moderator to fuel ratio. The amount of neutron will increase as we increase the amount of moderator Nm because the high amount moderator will make the leakage of neutron decreases. Then the absorption of neutron will be high and the thermal utilization factor will decrease and also resonance escape probability will increase. All of this trend can be seen in Figure 1. As we decrease the amount of moderator from the right to the left graph, the Nm/Nu ratio will decrease, then increase in slowing down time. This will increase the loss in neutrons by the resonance absorption thus increase the neutron in leakage. In practice, water-moderated reactor is designed with a Nm/Nu so that it can operated under moderated condition as shown in Figure 1. From Figure 1, when the temperature increases, the Nm/Nu decreases and because the water density becomes less, it’s creating the positive reactivity addition. The positive reactivity addition ρ will increase the effective multiplication factor and further increase the power and temperature in a dangerous cycle. This state called over moderated region. However when the same temperature increases would decreases the Nm/Nu and the density of water become decrease, the negative reactivity will be occurred. The effective multiplication factor keff will decrease and further decrease the power and the temperature in safe cycle. All of this can be explained in Figure 1. The Chernorbyl reactor power plan used the Boiling Water Reactor (BWR). It is uses water-moderated reactor. The disaster incident happened because there was no negative reactivity feedback effect in this reactor to lower down the reactor power as temperature. We hope that for the future, the engineer must take consideration of Nm/Nu ration in their design and put their design in under moderated region to make sure their reactor becomes more self-regulating.





Monday, September 27, 2010

The need for better information on Nuclear Energy towards the public.

In general, it seems the people increasingly supportive of nuclear when they feel better informed. Survey in Europe country shows that a quarter feel "completely uninformed" about them and a further half feel  "not very well informed". As seen above, the feeling of being informed is linked to whether or not a country has nuclear power plants....

The mass media are peoples main source of information, with 87% getting their information from television, 44% from radio and 37% from local or regional newspaper. Only a few think that media provide sufficient information to form an opinion on nuclear issues. But then who is trusted to provide information on nuclear safety?, the table below provide some insight towards the issue (From Safety and Energy Technologies polls).....

Although the mass media are the most used sources to gather news, in the case of nuclear safety people tend not to trust journalist as much as more specialized sources of information such as scientist or environmental organisations. National Goverments are trusted by less than 1/3 of the people. lol! =P...

 The public primarily trust scientist and NGOs on nuclear matters. Trust in national governments on these issues is low, presenting a clear problem for how governments can successfully communicate with their public. If Malaysia plan to build Nuclear Power Plant in the future, 60% nationwide must in favor of using nuclear energy.

This will give a rough idea on how to win people support for government plant on building nuclear power plant, that is by providing information on these matter by trusted source.



Lets see what you think about Nuclear energy =)

Tuesday, September 21, 2010

Who Are We


GROUP PROJECT
INTRODUCTION TO NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGY (MEHB513)
GROUP NAME
“ Nuke4iNfernO ”
GROUP LOGO

GROUP MEMBERS :




Name           : Mohd Saiful Adli B Mohd Sidek

Student ID   : ME078347

Course         : Mechanical  Engineering
Email           : mr_dely@yahoo.com
Birthday      : 31 August 1987

Hometown  : Teluk Intan, Perak

H/P number : 017-5699082
__________________________________________________________









Name           : Mohd Hazran B. Abu Hassan Fikri
Student ID   : EP078741
Course         : Electrical Power Engineering
Email           : hazran_engine2010@yahoo.com
Birthday       : 18 February 1987
Hometown  : Baling, Kedah
H/P number : 017-3995131

_______________________________________________________







Name           : Mohd Fikri B. Nazir
Student ID   : ME078275
Course         : Mechanical  Engineering
Email           : fikri_9786@yahoo.com
Birthday      : 07 September 1986
Hometown  :  Kota Sarang Semut Kedah
H/P number : 017-5555613

_________________________________________________________








Name           : Wira Karya B. Mohd Ariffin
Student ID   : ME078561
Course         : Mechanical  Engineering
Email           : wira_karya87@yahoo.com
Birthday      : 08 February 1987
Hometown  : Petaling Jaya, Selangor
H/P number : 017-2722881




____________________________________________________________